Minimizing bias requires a thorough understanding of the British Government and how it operates to interpret Revolutionary events in North America fully. Will Monk provides a concise overview in an article published in the Journal of the American Revolution.
Primary Sources
Baule, Steven M., and Stephen Gilbert. British Army Officers Who Served in the American Revolution, 1775-1783. Westminster, Md: Heritage Books, 2004.
K. G. Davies, el al, eds. Documents of the American Revolution, 1770-1783: Colonial Office Series. 21 vols. Shannon: Irish University Press, 1972.
Murdoch, David Hamilton, ed. Rebellion in America: A Contemporary British Viewpoint, 1765-1783. Santa Barbara, Calif: Clio Books, 1979.
Reprints from Britain’s Annual Register. An excellent source for the popular view of the American War for Independence among the British populace.
Secondary Source
Bowler, Arthur R. Logistics and the Failure of the British Army in America. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1975.
Butler, Lewis. The Annals of the King’s Royal Rifle Corps. London: Smith, Elder & Co., 1913.
Curtis, Edward E. The Organization of the British Army in the American Revolution. Gansevoort, N.Y.: Corner House Historical Publications, 1998.
Derry, John Wesley. English Politics and the American Revolution. London: J.M. Dent and sons, 1976.
Edelson, S. Max. The New Map of Empire: How Britain Imagined America before Independence. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2017.
Fortescue, John. The War of Independence: The British Army in North America, 1775 – 1783. Original 1911. London: Greenhill Books, 2001.
Gilchrist, Marianne McLeod. Patrick Ferguson: “A Man of Some Genius.” Edinburgh: NMS Enterprises, 2003.
Hagist, Don N. British Soldiers, American War: Voices of the American Revolution. Yardley, PA: Westholme, 2012.
Hagist, Don N. Noble Volunteers: The British Soldiers Who Fought the American Revolution. Yardley, PA: Westholme Publishing, 2020.
The vast predominance of books on the American Revolution are written from an “American Patriot” or Rebel perspective. As a result, historians regularly repeat misleading myths about the British soldiers acting as rapacious and brutal “bloody-backs” or “lobsters”. Through years of detailed research of regimental muster rolls and orderly books, Don N. Hagist dispels these myths. First a substantial percentage of soldiers in the British Army were not British but hailed from many parts of Europe and the Americas. Hagist provides another myth-busting example. British soldiers were predominantly literate and often read classical literature for recreation. Further, his book demonstrates that the British soldiers fought valiantly for the cause they espoused and the experiences of British soldiers are just as interesting as those of the Continental Army.
Hargreaves, Reginald. The Bloodybacks – The British Servicemen in North America and the Caribbean 1655-1783. London: Rupert Hart-Davis, 1968.
Johnson, Donald F. Occupied America: British Military Rule and the Experience of Revolution. Early American Studies. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2020.
There are numerous accounts of life for non-combatants during the rebellion. However, Donald F. Johnson’s new book is the first account of the experiences of the civilian population under British military rule. He posits that poor leadership and many miscalculations turned the local populous under military rule more against the British, that did “taxation without representation.” Johnson describes the British military administration in New York, Philadelphia, Charlestown and other areas held by the British. Only in Georgia did the British have a short-term measure of success in reestablishing a civilian government loyal to the Crown. Other locations operated as extended military camps in which civilians were neither given rights nor a voice in government. He cites this lack of a loyal civilian government as a major reason for the failure of the British to put down the rebellion.
Researching the American Revolution 